The query that baffles many Malawians at this time is that this: how can Dalitso Kabambe, who has assumed the presidency of the UTM Party and is actively collaborating in politics, nonetheless be thought-about a civil servant? The authorities’s obvious reluctance to take decisive motion towards him raises critical issues concerning the utility of the legislation and the integrity of public service.

In a latest interview, Ministry of Justice spokesperson Frank Namangale confirmed that Kabambe stays a civil servant, citing his appointment on the Reserve Bank of Malawi (RBM) as a secondment. Yet, regardless of this clear breach of each the Constitution and the Malawi Public Service Regulation (MPSR), which explicitly prohibit civil servants from partaking in energetic politics, the federal government stays passive.

This hesitation starkly contrasts with previous actions. In September 2018, George Saonda and Chiza Mbekeani had been fired for his or her involvement in politics. Both served in senior administrative roles, but had been swiftly dismissed. A letter from then Chief Secretary Lloyd Muhara explicitly cited their “active involvement in politics” as grounds for termination. Why, then, is Kabambe seemingly above the legislation?

Despite the Office of President and Cabinet’s (OPC) silence, a senior authorities official revealed that the OPC is conscious of Kabambe’s political actions and {that a} resolution from the Secretary to President and Cabinet (SPC) is pending. But why the delay? Why is Kabambe nonetheless shielded from the results that befell Saonda and Mbekeani?

Kabambe might go for voluntary retirement, having served over twenty years within the civil service. However, insiders counsel that is unlikely. His ongoing authorized battle for damages associated to his termination as RBM Governor appears to supply extra profitable prospects than a retirement package deal. This raises one other important query: Is Kabambe’s continued civil service standing merely a strategic transfer to bolster his authorized claims towards the federal government?

When pressed on this, Kabambe referred to ongoing courtroom circumstances, along with his lawyer, Marshall Chilenga, declining to remark. Meanwhile, Namangale argued that Kabambe’s secondment as RBM Governor was authorized, and his subsequent de-secondment to OPC didn’t represent unfair dismissal. Yet, this authorized maneuvering does little to deal with the core challenge: how can Kabambe have interaction in political actions whereas being handled as a civil servant?

The authorities’s inaction sends a troubling message. Is there a double commonplace at play? Are sure people untouchable, allowed to flout the legislation with impunity? This case isn’t just about one man; it displays a broader malaise inside the public service, the place guidelines are utilized selectively, and accountability is a distant dream.

As Kabambe continues to straddle the traces between politics and public service, the federal government’s credibility hangs within the stability. Malawians deserve clear solutions and decisive motion. The legislation should be upheld, with out concern or favor. Kabambe’s case is a check of our dedication to justice and integrity in public service. Will the federal government rise to the event, or will it proceed to dither, permitting a tradition of impunity to thrive? The nation is watching.

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Sharing is caring!